Good Intentions vs Original Intent

[ad#Network Funding]

Though Unwelcome Change was Crucial

Watch Last Week’s Video Here  |  Submit Feedback to HUD on Financial Assessment Here
[vimeo id=”74495979″ width=”625″ height=”352″]

Reverse Industry Change

The Importance Of Intent In The Reverse Mortgage Industry

The saying goes “the road to hell is paved with good intentions”. The same could be said of the federally-insured reverse mortgage program’s recent predicament and HUD’s swift action to avoid disaster…the closure of the program. Much of the recent reverse mortgage news has focused on the announced overhaul of the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage Program, but few look at or understand it’s original intent. The words original intent are fitting when examine the origins of our program versus its evolution over the last 24 years. The Housing & Community Development Act which laid the groundwork for the reverse mortgage program says the purpose is “to meet the special needs of elderly homeowners by reducing the effect of the economic hardship caused by the increasing costs of meeting health, housing, and subsistence needs at a time of reduced income, through the insurance of home equity conversion mortgages to permit the conversion of a portion of accumulated home equity into liquid assets.”

FHA to Reexamine MMI Fund Projections

[ad#Network Funding]

A Second Look at MMI Fund after Program Changes…

BREAKING:Read Mortgagee Letters 2013-27 & 2013-28 for complete details of changes.

[vimeo id=”73486075″ width=”625″ height=”352″]

Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund A second look at the Mutual Mortgage Insurance Fund is exactly what FHA plans do to after setting the wheels in motion for historic changes to the reverse mortgage. Yes, after committing to eliminating both the Standard and Saver product in lieu of a new one FHA wants another look. It all began in November 2012 when an Actuarial review of the MMI fund found that the reverse mortgage portion accounted for a negative 2.8 billion dollar economic value. Economic value is a better description than losses for these are projected losses based on actuarial analysis and data. In other words, with home values that fell this percent and projected loan balances and appreciation the fund would pay X dollars. Early figures showed the HECM portion of the fund accounted for 2.8 billion in projected losses of the 16 billion dollar overall future shortfall. Later that figure was revised to show projected losses from reverse mortgages totaling $5.2 billion. The dire numbers were too unsettling to ignore. So why the second look at the fund at this stage?