BREAKING: HECM Lending Limit Increased

by Shannon Hicks
| One Comment
| December 8, 2019

HECM lending limits increased for the 4th consecutive year

Tuesday, December 3rd FHA released Mortgagee Letter 2019-20 announcing the new maximum claim amount (or lending limit) for Home Equity Conversion Mortgages. The new limit of $765.600 is in effect for the calendar year 2020 and represents a nearly $39,000 increase from last year’s MCA. The move is not an unusual one. Reverse Mortgage Daily reports that the Housing and Economic Recovery Act or HERA mandates that conforming loan limits must reflect changes in the average U.S. home price…

Editor in Chief: HECMWorld.com

As a prominent commentator and Editor in Chief at HECMWorld.com, Shannon Hicks has played a pivotal role in reshaping the conversation around reverse mortgages. His unique perspectives and deep understanding of the industry have not only educated countless readers but has also contributed to introducing practical strategies utilizing housing wealth with a reverse mortgage.

Shannon’s journey into the world of reverse mortgages began in 2002 as an originator and his prior work in the financial services industry. Shannon has been covering reverse mortgage news stories since 2008 when he launched the podcast HECMWorld Weekly. Later, in 2010 he began producing the weekly video series The Industry Leader Update and Friday’s Food for Thought.

Readers wishing to submit stories or interview requests can reach our team at: info@hecmworld.com.

1 Comment

The_Cynic
December 9, 2019 at 11:58 am
Will this marginal increase of less than 6% have any real noticeable impact on the HECM endorsement numbers? Very unlikely. On the other hand if that increase in the lending limit increases the UPB on a loan you are originating say $20,000, the related increase in your commission could be a nice little “bonus.”

With the RMSA (Reverse Mortgage Stabilization Act of 2013, PL 113-29), what is the need of Congress eliminating the single national limit and returning to county by county limits? PL 113-29 is codified in 12 USC 1715z-20(h)(3) as follows:

“(h)Administrative authority

The Secretary may—

(3)establish, by notice or mortgagee letter, any additional or alternative requirements that the Secretary, in the Secretary’s discretion, determines are necessary to improve the fiscal safety and soundness of the program authorized by this section, which requirements shall take effect upon issuance.”

Is the purpose in making it the change a legislative proposal rather than invoking 12 USC 1715z-20(h)(3) a political one?
- Reply
- Link