2 comments

James E. Veale, CPA, MBT April 15, 2011 at 6:03 pm

The displaced spouse rule is far more problematic and complex than simply keeping seniors with under aged spouses from obtaining HECMs. There is still the problem of married couples who were not married when the HECM was taken out. This is clearly far more problematic and is probably a far bigger problem.

Then there is the issue of domestic partners. How do they fare under this provision? If 12 USC 1715z-20(j) proves to be upheld as the attorneys for the plaintiffs interpret it, there are many questions to answer. We are just looking at a part of the issue.

Reply
The_Critic April 18, 2011 at 10:11 am

Domestic partners? Leave it to a California CPA to dream up another but very relevant issue regarding displaced spouses.

However, I agree. The discussion on this issue falls far too short. This is a far greater issue than spouses at origination.

Congress needs to amend the displaced spouse provision by clarifying they are referring to a co-borrowing spouse.

Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

HECMWorld.com uses cookies to improve user-experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Cookies View Policy

DON'T MISS OUT!
Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Be the first to get latest Reverse Industry updates and exclusive HECMWorld.com content straight to your email inbox.
Your information will never be shared.
close-link
FREE Lead Quote
Lead Central is your trusted resource for reverse mortgage leads. Get your
no-obligation quote today
No form shown? Click here
Fill out my online form.
Your information is only shared with our approved lead vendors and will never be sold to an authorized party.
close-link