The_Cynic October 7, 2011 at 3:06 pm

In reading the letter, there is really not much said other than lenders already have the right to reject applications. It does not seem to permit any modifications to the terms of the loan or allow lender mandated set asides. That is an important distinction.

Will the drastic increase in counseling dropout rate be considered? As of yet there is no known impact in the default rate since it generally takes several years before that rate begins to be fully realized.

How soon will HUD address the modifications presented in the June letter to Karin Hill?

Lots of questions, few answers!!!!

Jeffrey Bochner October 10, 2011 at 6:38 am

Lenders SHOULD underwrite for capacity to pay taxes and insurance.
Although mandated set-asides not allowed, perhaps ‘optional’ set asides should be suggested. Too bad States don’t have a mechanism to have monthly tax payments ACH’d from borrower accounts.
Every insurer I know will accept a ongoing monthly electronic debit so half the problem can be solved with nothing from HUD or the lenders.

The_Cynic October 10, 2011 at 10:23 am


Voluntary set-asides sound great but if the senior has the right to revoke those set asides, how do they reduce lender risk? If they can be revoked, they should not be considered in whether or not the application should be accepted.

CLIFF RIDDLE October 10, 2011 at 11:55 am

we realy need more convusing paper work for us seniors,,,,,,,,,,,some companies are over 75 pages ,,,,what the heck why not another 10 to 15 ???? asuming it has to be at least 2 or 3 copies ,,,,,,,,,

Richard Kay October 10, 2011 at 12:53 pm

RM’s require the maintenance of the property, as well as, payment of taxes and insurance already. Further underwriting will soon lead to lender imposed escrows and will ultimately eliminate more seniors who have already lost equity. Unless HUD can provide a uniform guide for RM lenders, this is a slippery slope!

Elio Ronchini October 12, 2011 at 12:12 pm

Sorry for making the statement again that seniors should not be asked to pay property taxes slated for schools. Since we cannot use the benefits of doing so, we should not be asked to pay. Does anybody out there share the same opinion? If not please explain why we should.

yvonne jordan April 13, 2015 at 6:38 pm

I agree 100%. My kids been gone from home over 30 years. why am I still paying taxes for other people kids education? That makes no sense to me, please give me an explanation as to why. Can someone do that for me.


Leave a Reply to yvonne jordan Cancel Reply

HECMWorld.com uses cookies to improve user-experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Cookies View Policy

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Be the first to get latest Reverse Industry updates and exclusive HECMWorld.com content straight to your email inbox.
Your information will never be shared.