Israeli startup seeks to fill U.S. HECM opportunity gap

Israeli startup seeks to fill reverse mortgage market gap

A recent Jerusalem Post column announces the entry of a Tel-Aviv-based equity release company that plans to expand its operations in the U.S.  “Almost 80% of the seniors in the United States own the property they live in — this is an unprecedented number,” explained SixtyFive co-founder and COO Eyal Stern. According to their website SixtyFive-com, the company is “a multidisciplinary team of experts with a background in technology, law, finance, longevity, and real estate”. Their objective is to provide a unique financial offering that …

Read More


Paul Gubin February 20, 2023 at 10:19 am

Great to see that smart business people can provide an alternative and needed solution for seniors entering or already in retirement. Anytime we can eliminate barriers to entry, we are doing a great service for the RM space as a needed and welcome alternative for senior homeowners.

James E. Veale, MBT February 22, 2023 at 7:48 am

Consumers, like all such agreements, make sure that you have received appropriate, competent, and independent legal and other advice before entering into this agreement. Since it is not a mortgage (as cited in the company’s summary of the agreement), its terms would typically be unfamiliar to most consumers.

Some may not feel comfortable about this product. Here are just a few of the possible reasons why. The quotations are taken from small and lighter type on the company’s landing page at

1) The senior must retitle the property in the name of a trust that the company holds an interest in. “Assuming your home qualifies, you will need to transfer your home to a trust to initiate the program…. Under the trust, we are automatically allocated units of value.”

2) There are two fees. The first is the management fee. It is accrued monthly. This fee is calculated by multiplying the balance due from the prior month plus the current amount paid for the month (before reduction for the servicing fee) times a variable rate interest element. That rate is Prime plus 400 bps (i.e., Prime plus 4%). Unfortunately “Prime” is not defined on that webpage. “The management fee will vary based on market conditions (Prime+400 bps).”

3) The other fee is a so called “servicing fee.” It is a fixed amount and REDUCES the monthly payment to the participant. “The servicing fee is a fixed amount that is withheld from each month’s funds made available to you.”

4) This was a rather interesting statement: “However, your total fees will not exceed 18% on an annual basis.”

5) “SixtyFive will re-assess your eligibility for the program every three (3) years.” This implies that the company can cancel the agreement after the first three years and if does not do so, it has the right to do so once every three years thereafter until the agreement terminates.

6) This was a rather interesting statement: “However, your total fees will not exceed 18% on an annual basis.”

7) Still wondering if the amount due to the company is interest, just read the following from the so called “Tax Disclosure” section: “Please note that SixtyFive’s product is not a mortgage loan. Due to the unique nature of SixtyFive’s program, the tax benefits associated with interest payments on a traditional mortgage will not be available to you. To understand the tax consequences of using SixtyFive’s product fully, you will need to contact a tax professional. SixtyFive is unable to provide tax related advice to you.”

This is no HECM or even an equivalent. One wonders if the company is sufficiently funded to make the required payments timely or at all?

Who is the regulator over this product? We know HUD certainly is not. What federal agency is? If regulated by the state only, does that regulator have the staff who are capable of truly overseeing these products?

I have only cited a few of the company’s summarized terms of this agreement and may have missed terms that are essential to any decision making about this product.

Consumers beware.

Shannon Hicks February 22, 2023 at 10:37 am

Excellent analysis. I will include your points in a recap on a future episode.

James E. Veale, MBT March 1, 2023 at 8:20 am

I forgot to mention one thing. There is no appraisal. The estimate of value is allegedly computed using an AVM (Automated Valuation Models). Homeowner, check that value carefully as AVMs do not necessarily reflect current market values of homes.

Shannon Hicks March 1, 2023 at 10:24 am

Good point!

Dave Wilson March 1, 2023 at 11:05 am

“Under the trust, we are automatically allocated units of value.”…..

Sounds like an equity-share model.

James E. Veale, MBT March 5, 2023 at 4:27 pm


This is not equity sharing but joint ownership through a trust. Title change as does ownership over time through the trust. Worse one must requalify every three years.

Or perhaps your definition of equity sharing is that broad. As a licensed California real estate broker, equity sharing is much different than having an interest in the entire home.

In some states the transfer of ownership could trigger a reevaluation of the home for property tax purposes or the loss of a homestead exemption. In real estate the details matter


Leave a Comment uses cookies to improve user-experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Cookies View Policy

Subscribe To Our Newsletter
Be the first to get latest Reverse Industry updates and exclusive content straight to your email inbox.
Your information will never be shared.