Can a Foreclosure Occur with a Reverse Mortgage?

reverse mortgage foreclosure

As a mortgage professional, I worked nights and weekends as a housing counselor during the financial crisis. Foreclosures are scary and heartbreaking, and I will admit to crying with clients when their only option was to pick up boxes behind the grocery store and find any friend with a truck. No, these were not reverse mortgage borrowers. They were homeowners with subprime loans, option arms, and even traditional 30-year fixed-rate mortgages. In fact, it was the reverse mortgage that prevented innumerable foreclosures and bankruptcies during this difficult time. The experience of saving countless homeowners from this misery changed my life forever.

The cases mentioned in the recent USA Today article were tragic. However, the article fails to recognize that not all foreclosures are equal, and there are no easy solutions when retirees need to access housing wealth to survive.

So, can a foreclosure occur with a reverse mortgage?

The short answer is yes. ANY homeowner or estate can lose a home for various reasons. While the media sensationalizes this as “news,” they haven’t taken the time to understand reverse. But as ridiculous as this sounds to the novice, there are ACCEPTABLE foreclosures from the borrowers’ (and the heirs’) point of view.

Consider Susan, who after the after the death of her father decided to “walk away” from the property she inherited. That’s okay. Susan is protected by the “non-recourse” feature that guarantees her right to do this… with no recourse, even if the loan balance far exceeds the value of the property. While this type of foreclosure is often vilified by the media, it was a very favorable financial transaction for Susan’s father, and a non-recourse foreclosure was ACCEPTABLE to Susan.

When we think of foreclosure, we naturally think of the most common reason traditional (forward) loans end in foreclosure – failure to make the required monthly mortgage payment. Of course, that wouldn’t make sense with a reverse mortgage that carries no monthly repayment obligation. So, it’s understandable why homeowners, their heirs, and the media are often confused when they see that reverse mortgage foreclosures happen from time to time.

WHY WOULD A REVERSE FORECLOSURE OCCUR?

reverse mortgage foreclosure
USA Today’s recent expose overlooks the true reasons behind reverse mortgage ‘foreclosures’.

While reverse mortgages don’t require a monthly principal and interest mortgage payment during the life of the loan, there are other borrower obligations contained in the reverse mortgage loan agreement. The borrower has agreed to occupy and maintain the home, as well as pay all property-related charges. Failure to do these things will cause the loan to mature. When a loan maturity event happens, the borrower (or their heirs) will often sell the home to pay off the loan balance.

For example, when the last surviving borrower leaves the home for 12 consecutive months for mental or physical incapacity (e.g. nursing home or assisted living), that is a maturity event. The borrower or their heirs will often notify the lender of their intentions to sell the property. The lender will then allow them 6 months to sell the home and HUD generally approves two 3-month extensions for up to one year. 

If no action is taken to sell the home, the lender will need to foreclosure on the home, handling the sale themselves so that the loan can be repaid.

The following are two common reasons reverse foreclosures occur:

  1. No equity remains at loan maturity

When the loan balance exceeds any reasonable sales price of the home, the estate has no economic incentive to sell the home on their own. Fortunately, all reverse mortgages are “non-recourse” loans. Nevertheless, foreclosure is the mechanism that conveys title to HUD (or the Lender) so the home can be sold to pay off at least a portion of the loan balance.

  1. A property tax default occurs

Failure to pay property taxes will almost always result in foreclosure. This is true whether the homeowner has a reverse mortgage, a traditional mortgage, or no mortgage at all. However, the lender is the major lien-holder on the home and is required by federal guidelines to foreclose on the property for most reverse mortgages.

Keep in mind, a reverse mortgage naturally allows the homeowner access to funds, which should theoretically REDUCE the likelihood that a borrower will default on their obligations. But with the increased financial pressures of retirement, we cannot always guarantee that homeowners will keep funds in reserve.

PROPERTY CHARGE FORECLOSURES ARE DOWN DRAMATICALLY!

While nothing can be done to keep people from the grave, two measures were implemented by HUD over the last six years that have been helpful in reducing the numbers of foreclosures caused by tax defaults – Initial Disbursement Limits and Financial Assessment.

Initial disbursement limits were implemented that restrict the consumption of proceeds for the first year of the loan. Unless the borrower has large mortgage payoffs that necessitate higher draws, the borrower may be initially limited to 60% of their funds. As a result, borrowers now keep a portion of their proceeds in a growing line-of-credit available for future emergencies.

Financial Assessment requires the lender to examine the credit history, property charge history, and residual income for one primary reason – to determine whether the reverse mortgage is a sustainable solution for the borrower. To ensure sustainability, some borrowers are now required to set-aside a portion of the proceeds to pay property charges.

These two changes have reduced the number of reverse mortgages nationwide but has also reduced the number of foreclosures.

Yes. Foreclosures can happen, and they will continue to occur. Remember, Susan walked away because her father consumed more available funds during his retirement than the home was eventually worth. For more information on all forms of reverse mortgage product offerings, consider buying the reverse mortgage resource consumers and finance professionals use – Understanding Reverse.

Dan Hultquist, MBA, CRMP

Dan Hultquist is Vice President of Organizational Development at Finance of America Reverse (FAR), the largest wholesale provider of reverse mortgages. He has spoken nationally on the topic of Reverse Mortgages, and his training sessions have exceeded 25,000 in attendance over the last decade. He is a Certified Reverse Mortgage Professional (CRMP), and co-chairs the Education Committee for the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association (NRMLA). He also teaches continuing education courses that serve as annual requirements for CRMPs. Dan is a Penn State graduate and obtained an MBA from Kennesaw State University. He lives outside Atlanta with his wife and 3 children.

A Convenient Scapegoat



PRC Title settlement reverse mortgages

“If it bleeds it leads”. This phrase gives the general public a peek behind the curtain of print and television journalism’s choice of what’s ‘news’ and how it is presented (slanted). Fear-based news has become even more profitable with the advent of online news sites seeking salacious headlines using fear to garner more clicks, site traffic and ultimately advertising dollars. The Washington Post’s recent article, “More seniors are taking loans against their homes- and it’s costing them” is actually more fair-minded than the headline, yet overlooks one most important caveat.

reverse mortgage newsAny senior who is displaced from their home can fairly be described as a true American tragedy, each warranting an examination of the underlying unique causes that ultimately led to foreclosure. Truthfully, some reverse mortgages should have never been written for seniors who would unlikely be able to afford to make the required ongoing property payments for taxes and homeowner’s insurance. Those at greatest risk of future foreclosure often had little existing income, a history of poor money management, and no limitations on how quickly they exhausted their available loan proceeds. I recall the sense of dread and frustration that washed over me years ago as I pulled up to my applicant’s home only to see a newly-purchased RV in the driveway. The loan had not even funded and substantial hurdles remained.

“Tens of thousands of troubled loans remain. More than 18 percent of reverse mortgage loans taken out from 2009 to June 2016 are expected to go into default because of unpaid taxes and insurance, according to the HUD report”, the Post dutifully reports. With this in mind, it should come as no surprise that HUD may have intentionally shifted the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage further from the cash-strapped ‘needs-based-borrower’ and into the hands of the more affluent borrower with the Financial Assessment.  In fact a recent report from HECM counselors confirms that fewer needs-based borrowers are entering counseling. With mounting projected losses from technical defaults there was little choice but the rein in default rates and payouts from FHA’s insurance fund which backs HECM loans.

While well-researched the Post’s article fails to mention one key detail, both traditional mortgage and reverse mortgage loans require the borrower to keep their property taxes and insurance paid up or risk the ensuing foreclosure and displacement from the home. In this respect, the reverse mortgage has become the all to convenient scapegoat for the financial woes of senior homeowners facing a loan default.

A number of factors can contribute to HECM borrower’s losing their home due to nonpayment of property obligations.

  • Spendthrifts. Homeowners who quickly spend the money they’ve never had before, not considering the future financial impact and risks.
  • Bad habits. A significant number of seniors who took a reverse mortgage needed one to bail them out of a financial mess. Bad habits and poor financial decision making do not stop once they get a reverse mortgage.
  • Suitability. Before the Financial Assessment, many older homeowners only postponed the foreclosure of their home refinancing their existing mortgage, with little residual cash flow remaining after the elimination of monthly mortgage payments. A short term solution with an unhappy ending.
  • Financial abuse. The inconvenient truth is the vast majority of financial crimes committed against elders are done by the adult children and relatives of the borrower.  There are many documented cases of children or caregivers misusing funds intended to pay taxes and insurance.
  • Financial Shocks: Despite the best-laid plans, the unexpected death of a spouse or a medical crisis can sink the financial ship of even the most cautious HECM borrower.

Despite the claims of false advertising, it is true that a reverse mortgage allows borrowers to remain in their home without ever making another payment- mortgage payment that is. That said, the new requirements of disclosing required property charge payments (something traditional mortgages should disclose), the Financial Assessment, and the move toward more affluent borrowers have already dramatically reduced the number of HECM defaults.

Until the risky loans of yesteryear are terminated, the reverse mortgage may remain a tempting scapegoat of mortgage lending in eyes of the media. Just be sure to remind them of what Paul Harvey so famously said was ‘the rest of the story’.

reverse mortgage news

What are your thoughts? Please leave your input in the Comments section below, and share this post on social media using the Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn icons at the top of this page. Thank you!

A Surprise HECM Foreclosure?

ePath 100K RM leads


Possible Remedies to Prevent HECM Defaults

reverse mortgage newsThe reverse mortgage industry could lament it’s treatment in the media, in the words of Rodney Dangerfield, “that’s the story of my life…no respect”.

NBC4’s consumer reporter dramatically recounts the tale of a HECM borrower who narrowly avoided foreclosure. The borrower’s power of attorney also serves as her live-in caregiver. The caregiver claims she was surprised by a foreclosure notice received in the mail and attempted to pay the insurance premium but the payment was returned because the auction was already scheduled. *UPDATE* I repeatedly pressed an employee with NBC4’s Consumer Union if the homeowner’s insurance company had in fact sent billing notices to the homeowner. His reply was “They acknowledged that they sent bills not in line with an arranged payment plan which is why the error occurred.”

Reverse mortgage borrowers must pay their property taxes and homeowner’s insurance or risk foreclosure. The same requirement applies to traditional mortgage borrowers.For several years reverse mortgage documents have included a clear statement informing borrowers of these obligations and the risks of non-payment. While the media jumps to expose the plight of seniors being. Here are some other points to consider for HECM borrower’s facing foreclosure for non-payment of property charges.

One advantage traditional mortgage borrowers have is the automatic payment of property taxes and insurance from their escrow account. While such an arrangement is practical for those making monthly principal and interest payments it is highly problematic for HECM borrowers facing a sizable reduction in available funds if a lump sum Lifetime Expectancy Set Aside (LESA) is required. Perhaps a better solution for reverse mortgage borrowers would be the implementation of monthly auto-drafts for insurance and an auto-draft into a HECM escrow account to fund property tax payments every six months. If feasible, such an arrangement could avoid the onerous lump sums required for a LESA.

Download the video transcript here.

Are More HECM Reforms Needed?

ePath reverse mortgage leads


Are More Rule Changes Needed or Does Data Need to Be Reexamined?

The new year is upon us and we can leave 2016 in the rear view mirror, with the exception of HUD’s pending reverse mortgage rules. Are additional HECM reforms truly needed to strengthen the HECM program?

loading-iconIn the wake of the election and the new year, lingering HECM program changes can be easily forgotten. Last May FHA introduced a series of new rules to strengthen the Home Equity Conversion Mortgage program. The changes included required HECM counseling prior to signing s mortgage contract, disclosure of all HECM features and options, and most problematically, a 5% lifetime cap on the adjustable rate HECM with a 1% annual interest rate cap. Numerous industry participants and the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association submitted inputs to the agency in the Federal Register. Several months have passed and yet there is no word if these substantial product changes will be enacted. Presently the proposed rule changes are in the final rule stage prior to regulatory review.

Many industry participants have voiced their concern that these changes will negatively impact the HECM program. Perhaps a more relevant point is the question if such changes are even necessary. Is the HECM program’s economic outlook as bleak as HUD’s recent report to Congress suggests?

HUD’s most recent report to Congress shows the HECM portion of FHA’s portfolio is valued at a negative $7.7 billion dollars. That represents a $13 billion dollar swing to the negative dropping from the previous year’s valuation of a positive $6.8 billion. Much of the impact can be attributed to slowing home appreciation upon which much of the economic modeling depends upon.

However, what is somewhat problematic are reports that HUD’s internal assumption are based on 100% of the available principal limit is used at the beginning of the loan. This assumed front-loaded loan balance is then factored based on future interest rates and the borrower’s age. This mathematical approach drastically increase the negative amortization of the HECM loan and the assumed ending loan balance…

Download the video transcript here.

The Myth of Reverse Mortgage Foreclosures?

ePath reverse mortgage leads


Guttentag Questions the Definition of a HECM ‘Foreclosure’

“Whoever controls the language controls the debate”. The purported ‘epidemic’ of reverse mortgage foreclosures has long been a staple for major media outlets to attack the reverse mortgage as a risky and dangerous loan. Closer to home, the incidence of HECM foreclosures has been often cited as one justification for increased restrictions, product reengineering, and the financial assessment underwriting guidelines.

Jack Guttentag -"The Mortgage Professor"
Jack Guttentag -“The Mortgage Professor”

The media loves a good drama. Find a villain and add some emotional tension and you have a headline that is click-worthy. Such a scenario played out in a recent article on Bloomberg.com entitled “Mnuchin’s Reverse Mortgage Woes Blemish Record of Treasury Pick.” Jack Guttentag, aka the Mortgage Professor, was intrigued. The headline is timely since Steven Mnuchin was recently announced as president-elect Trump’s pick for Treasury Secretary. Mnuchin’s blemish in the article centers on his acquiring of IndyMac Bank in 2009 and with it Financial Freedom. Now we can see the ‘reverse mortgage’ connection that Bloomberg hints may point to alleged unethical business practices. Financial Freedom “has carried out 16,220 foreclosures since 2009, or about 39 percent of the country’s reverse mortgage foreclosures, according to HUD data obtained by the California Reinvestment Coalition…” Guttentag was skeptical that one lender could account for such a large percentage of HECM foreclosures.

What ‘foreclosure’ really means

Skeptical, Guttentag researched for the total number of HECM foreclosures since 2009. He uncovered a report provided by the agency to a consumer group in response to a freedom of information request. Since April 2009, there have been 41,237 reverse mortgage foreclosures accounting for roughly 4% of all…

Download the video transcript here.

Half Truths



New York Post Skewers Reverse Mortgages

media-spoonfeeding-cartoon-300x180While negative new stories about reverse mortgages have diminished considerably a few media outlets continue to beat the drum on the dangers of reverse mortgages leaving vulnerable seniors without a home. Reading such articles reminds me of Winston Churchill’s quote “A life gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get it’s pants on”.

On July 23rd the New York Post published an article entitled “Taking out a reverse mortgage ruined my life” by Catherine Curan. The story outlines the unfortunate series of events that befell Frederick Feil who lives in Howard Beach, a suburb of southwest Queens, New York…

Download a transcript of this episode here.

Looking for more reverse mortgage news, commentary, and technology? Visit ReverseFocus.com today

Moral Hazard?

Moral Hazard? One definition is the lack of incentive to guard against risk because one is protected from the consequences while the risk rests on another party. Is that what we have with reverse mortgage borrowers who have defaulted? Non-payment of taxes and insurance has been an issue. A look at what real estate columnist had to say recently.

Continue reading